The 2009 study below concluded that the Doigahama ancient remains were of individuals who most resembled ancient populations of Linzi in Shandong Province. However, both these remains show less affinity to modern Japanese populations than those from Kyushu’s Yayoi age remains.
Source: Igawa, Kazunari et al., Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Yayoi period human skeletal remains from the Doigahama site Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 54, 581–588; doi:10.1038/jhg.2009.81; published online 21 August 2009
From the abstract
“… The sequence types obtained in this study were compared with those of the modern Japanese, northern Kyushu Yayoi and ancient Chinese populations. We found that the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations belonged to the groups that include most of the modern Japanese population. In contrast, most of the Doigahama Yayoi population belonged to the group that includes a small number of the modern Japanese population. These results suggest that the Doigahama Yayoi population might have contributed less to the formation of the modern Japanese population than the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations. Moreover, when we examined the kinship between individuals in the Doigahama site, we found that the vicinal burial of adult skeletons indicated a maternal kinship, although that of juvenile skeletons did not. The vicinal burial style might have been influenced by many factors, such as paternal lineages, periods and geographical regions, as well as maternal lineages. In addition, skeletons considered to be those of shamans or leaders had the same sequence types. Their crucial social roles may have been inherited through maternal lineage.
Map of the Doigahama site, located in the southwestern part of Honshu, Japan
From the paper:
More than 300 Yayoi skeletal remains were excavated from the Doigahama site between 1953 and 2000. The preservation of the skeletal remains was relatively good for most of the specimens. However, as the osteomorphological study of the skeletal remains from the Doigahama site is still underway, the number of samples available for DNA analysis is limited. In this study, we could use only 14 skeletal remains that were stored at the Doigahama site anthropological museum
As to the regional differences in the immigrant Yayoi populations, there are many differences in the social and osteomorphological characteristics between the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations and the Doigahama Yayoi population. The lifestyle of the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations is believed to have differed from that of the Doigahama Yayoi population. The northern Kyushu Yayoi populations subsisted mainly on rice agriculture, whereas the Doigahama Yayoi population survived mainly by fishing and gathering.14 In addition, there is a great difference in the funerary customs between the northern Kyushu and Doigahama sites. Most of the skeletons at the sites in northern Kyushu were buried in jar coffins (Kamekan), but this burial style was not found at the Doigahama site, where stone coffins (Sekikan) and pits (Dokoubo) are common.15 In addition, many osteomorphological studies have been carried out on the skeletal remains from the sites in northern Kyushu and Doigahama.3, 16,17, 18, 19, 20, 21 Dodo et al.3 reported, on the basis of cranial nonmetric traits, that the protohistoric and historic Japanese were more closely related to the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations than to the Doigahama Yayoi population. These differences between the northern Kyushu sites and the Doigahama site provide us with important information for investigating the regional variations in the immigrant Yayoi populations and the influence of the immigrant Yayoi populations on the formation of the modern Japanese population.
Skeletal remains of the immigrant post-Jomon populations show a marked difference in morphological characteristics from those of the Jomon population, along with a closer similarity to the East-Asian populations and the post-Jomon Japanese population. The immigrant post-Jomon populations and their descendants have contributed considerably to the formation of the majority of the modern Japanese population.2, 5, 6, 8, 12, 13
The immigrant post-Jomon populations (the immigrant Yayoi populations) were mainly distributed in northern Kyushu and southwestern Honshu in the Yayoi period. Many northern Kyushu Yayoi sites, most of which existed from the middle to late phases of the Yayoi period, are located on the inland plains of northern Kyushu (Figure 1). By contrast, most of the southwestern Honshu Yayoi sites, which existed from the early to middle phases of the Yayoi period, are located on the northwest coast of the southwestern end of Honshu. The most representative burial site of the southwestern Honshu Yayoi sites is the Doigahama site (Figure 1).
In this study, we analyzed the control region for examining the genetic structure of the Doigahama Yayoi population. As a preliminary analysis of the phylogenetic relationships of the Doigahama Yayoi population, the HVI sequence types obtained in this study were compared with those of the northern Kyushu Yayoi, modern Japanese and ancient Chinese populations that have previously been reported by other researchers, and a phylogenetic network was constructed to outline the phylogenetic characteristics of the Doigahama Yayoi population.
A phylogenetic network constructed from sequence types of hypervariable region I (HVI). Large circles denote backbone types 1, 3, 7, 9, 13, 25, 113, 138 and 173.76 The numbers on the branches are the nucleotide positions where base substitutions have occurred (add 16 000 to these numbers to obtain the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS)). 
Denotes sequence types for the 2500-year-old Linzi population.77 
Denotes sequence types for the 2000-year-old Linzi population.37 
Denotes sequence types for the modern Japanese population.57 
Denotes sequence types for the Kuma-Nishioda Yayoi population.52 
Denotes sequence types for the Doigahama Yayoi population (present study). The numbers next to the small circles indicate the number of individuals in the sequence type.
On the basis of the phylogenetic reference network, six radiation groups were identified. Group I was characterized by n.p.16223C → T, without n.p.16362T → C. Group II was characterized by n.p.16362T → C, without n.p.16319G → A. Group III was characterized by base substitutions at n.p.16223, 16319 and 16362. Group IV was characterized by no nucleotide difference at n.p.16217, n.p.16223, n.p.16304, n.p.16319 and n.p.16362. Group V was characterized by n.p.16217T → C, without nucleotide difference at n.p.16223 and 16362. Group VI was characterized by n.p.16304T → C, without nucleotide differences at n.p.16223 and n.p.16362.
With regard to the Doigahama Yayoi specimens, only 1 individual belonged to group I; the other 12 individuals belonged to group IV. In all, 5, 2, 1, 22, 1 and 3 individuals from the 2500-year-old Linzi site belonged to groups I, II, III, IV, V and VI, respectively. For the individuals from the 2000-year-old Linzi site, 3, 4, 1 and 5 individuals belonged to groups I, II, V and VI, respectively. A total of 34 individuals and 1 individual from the Kuma-Nishioda Yayoi site belonged to groups I and V, respectively. In the modern Japanese population, 21, 21, 1, 3 and 4 individuals belonged to groups I, II, IV, V and VI, respectively.
The frequency distributions of six radiation groups in the Doigahama Yayoi and other populations are shown in Figure 3. We compared the frequency distributions of radiation groups in the Doigahama Yayoi population with those of the Kuma-Nishioda Yayoi population (one of the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations). The Doigahama Yayoi population showed a high frequency for group IV (92%), whereas the Kuma-Nishioda Yayoi population showed a high frequency for group I (97%).
Distribution (in %) of six radiation groups.
There is another important study on the Takuta-Nishibun Yayoi population in northern Kyushu: Oota et al.37 analyzed the HVI segments (n.p.16224–n.p.16391) of 14 remains from the Takuta-Nishibun site. As two informative sites (n.p.16217 and n.p.16223), which were used to determine the radiation groups I, IV and V, were not analyzed in their study, the data collected from the Takuta-Nishibun Yayoi population were not added to the phylogenetic network in this study. As the sequence type (n.p.16362T → C, without base substitution at n.p.16319) was found in 9 of the 14 individuals from the Takuta-Nishibun Yayoi population, these individuals belonged to group II (64%). Consequently, the Takuta-Nishibun Yayoi population might show a high frequency for group II. In addition, their study showed that many of the mtDNA sequence types from the Takuta-Nishibun Yayoi population belonged in the same cluster with those of the modern Japanese population.37
The modern Japanese population showed high frequencies for groups I (42%) and II (42%). The northern Kyushu Yayoi populations also showed high frequencies for these groups. In contrast, the Doigahama Yayoi population had a high frequency for group IV, for which the modern Japanese population showed a low frequency (2%). These findings suggest that the Doigahama Yayoi population might have contributed less to the modern Japanese gene pool than to the northern Kyushu Yayoi population. As described in the ‘Introduction’ section, it is suggested that there were many differences between the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations and the Doigahama Yayoi population in several morphological and archeological studies.3, 14, 15, 18, 19 The genetic results of this study support these previous morphological and archeological studies.
The 2500-year-old Linzi population (group I: 15%, group II: 6%, group III: 3%, group IV: 65%, group V: 3%, group VI: 9%) resembled the 2000–2300-year-old Doigahama Yayoi population with respect to the high frequency for group IV. It was suggested that there were phylogenetically similar populations in China and Japan during the ancient period, from 2500 to 2000 years ago.
On the other hand, the low frequencies of group IV in the modern East-Asian populations were reported by Wang et al.77 In addition, their study indicated that the 2500-year-old Linzi populations showed less genetic resemblance to modern East-Asian populations.77 These findings suggest that more than one ancient population, which had different phylogenetic characteristics from modern East-Asian populations, existed in the past in East Asia. This is informative for estimating the phylogenetic relationships among ancient East-Asian populations. The resemblance between the ancient populations in China and Japan might support the notion that ancient China is the place from which the Doigahama Yayoi population immigrated. The amount of genetic data is still not sufficient enough to discuss the phylogenetic relationships among the ancient East-Asian populations. Further genetic studies are required to shed light on the phylogenetic relationships among the ancient East-Asian populations.
Kinship analyses
Kinship relationships were examined by focusing on particularly interesting individuals in the Doigahama Yayoi population who were successfully sequenced in this study. Two categories of interest were identified. The first category involved two cases of vicinal burials (skeletons that were buried side by side) (nos 1405 and 1406 and nos 1903 and 1904, respectively). The second category involved skeletons that were believed to have had the same social role in the Doigahama population (nos 1 and 124).
As the present analysis covered only segments from the control region, these results are insufficient to determine the presence of kinship. Furthermore, if the population has small variability of the mtDNA sequence types, a concordance of sequence types does not always show the presence of a kinship. For these reasons, in this study, the possibility of a maternal kinship was examined using DNA analyses for the individuals, for which the possibility of kinship has been suggested in the archeological findings.
Cases of vicinal burials
Case A: nos 1405 and 1406
On the basis of the morphological evidence, both individuals were estimated to be middle-aged males. It is believed that no. 1405 was buried soon after no. 1406 (Table 1).78 They were buried opposite each other. No. 1405 was buried in a face-up position that was common at the Doigahama site, whereas no. 1406 was buried in a facedown position that was extremely rare at the Doigahama site.
Ritual tooth extraction was observed in both skulls. The teeth extracted from each individual differ. In no. 1405, the bilateral upper and lower lateral incisors were extracted, whereas in no. 1406, the bilateral upper canines were extracted. This custom has been observed frequently in skulls from ancient Japan during the Jomon and Yayoi periods. Harunari79 and Nakahashi80 have suggested that the type of tooth extraction might depend on differences in ancestry (and/or origin).
In the osteomorphological study, the skeletons differed not only by the size of the neurocranium but also in the length of the femur. In particular, the estimated body height differed greatly for each skeleton (no. 1405: 164.78 cm; no. 1406: 158.01 cm).81 There was little morphological similarity between these two individuals, although it is noted that the skeletal measurements of the femur and cranium show a family resemblance.82 As a whole, although the skeletons were buried side by side, the archeological and morphological findings were different.
The mtDNA analysis showed that both skeletons contained the same sequence types (Table 3). As the analysis covered only segments of the control region, this result is insufficient to determine the presence of kinship, but it suggests that the skeletons might have been buried side by side on the basis of their maternal lineage. As their burial times were relatively close to one another, a high level of consanguinity was considered likely; for example, they were believed to be brothers, or nephew and uncle, or cousins.
In this case, although many findings, such as burial positions, tooth extraction types and osteomorphological features, differed between these two individuals, the mtDNA sequences showed that the skeletons might be related along a maternal lineage. The differences in the archeological and morphological findings between the specimens might indicate some relationships other than the maternal lineage.
Case B: nos 1903 and 1904
According to the excavator’s report, no. 1903 was determined to be 4-years-old, and no. 1904 was 15.83 It has been estimated that no. 1903 was buried after no. 1904 (Table 1).84 Ritual tooth extraction was not observed in either skull, and there was no overt difference in the archeological findings between them. Moreover, as there is a large age difference between them, and the skeletons were in an immature stage, it was difficult to make a comparison using skeletal measurements. It has been suggested that the skeletons might have been buried on the basis of kinship because they were buried side by side.
Their mtDNA sequence types were different. In no. 1903, there was no nucleotide difference in HVI. On the other hand, in no. 1904, a 16266 C → T base substitution was observed in HVI. These results indicate that the skeletons were not related along the maternal lineage.
Using molecular biological methods, Adachi et al.40, 42 reported kinship analysis for skeletal specimens found in double burials excavated from the Jomon site. However, as there are many different factors, such as period, geographical region and burial style, between their study and our study, it is difficult to compare the results. The association between burial style and kinship is not entirely clear for individuals buried vicinally, as indicated by Cases A and B in this study. To clarify this association, it is necessary to accumulate more data with regard to the kinship between individuals and to analyze the data obtained from archeological and morphological findings.
In addition, to identify kinship relationships, it is necessary to examine the paternal as well as the maternal lineage. Many researchers have analyzed autochromosomes extracted from ancient human remains and have used them to examine the paternal lineage.30, 31, 33, 35 However, in general, ancient DNA is often highly damaged, which makes it rather difficult to analyze. It is hoped that a highly accurate and simple technique for ancient DNA analysis will be developed.
Adult skeletons that were believed to have the same social role in the Doigahama Yayoi population
The skeletal remains of individual no. 1, which were excavated along with a piece of cormorant skeleton, were estimated to be those of a middle-aged female. This was the only skeleton excavated along with bird bones from the Doigahama site. Individual no. 124, estimated to be a middle-aged adult male, was excavated with 12 stone arrow tips and 2 arrow tips made of shark teeth. Moreover, the skeleton had two bracelets made of cone shells (made fromTricornis latissimus, an organism that lives in the subtropical and tropical areas of the Pacific Ocean) on his right arm.
Owing to this unique burial style, it was suggested that these skeletons might have been those of shamans (or leaders) among the Doigahama Yayoi population.85 In addition, individual no. 1 showed ritual tooth extraction of the bilateral upper and lower lateral incisors. For no. 124, as the facial bones of the skull were fragmented, it was difficult to examine the whole of the alveolar bone. However, alveolar closure was observed in the right upper lateral incisor. Thus, it is possible that the lateral incisor was extracted from the skeleton during ritual tooth extraction. In this case, teeth extraction types might correspond with one anther. The skeletons were buried relatively close to each other, but not side by side. For this reason, these skeletons have never been examined in terms of their kinships.
mtDNA sequencing showed that the skeletons shared the same sequence types (Table 3). In both skeletons, a base substitution of 16209T → C was observed. Thus, the skeletons might have been related through a maternal lineage. These results suggest that the role of shaman might have been passed down through the maternal line in the Doigahama Yayoi population.
Kurosaki et al.35 reported that the two skeletons believed to be those of shamans or leaders at the Hanaura Yayoi site in northern Kyushu were not related along maternal and paternal lineages. These results differed from those of our study. These facts might suggest some regional differences in social structures during the Yayoi period.
CONCLUSIONS
We analyzed the segments of control regions in mtDNA extracted from 14 ancient human skeletal remains that were excavated from the Doigahama site. We amplified and sequenced mtDNA control regions from 13 of the 14 specimens. The HVI sequence types from specimens excavated from the Doigahama site were compared with those of the modern Japanese population, the northern Kyushu Yayoi populations and the ancient populations of the Shandon province of China. Although the analysis is preliminary, the results suggest that the Doigahama Yayoi population might have contributed less to the modern Japanese gene pool than the northern Kyushu Yayoi population.
Moreover, we examined the kinship among particularly interesting individuals in the Doigahama site. Our results showed that the two adult skeletons (nos 1405 and 1406) buried vicinally might have been related along a maternal lineage, but the two juvenile skeletons (nos 1903 and 1904) buried vicinally were not related. In cases of vicinal burials, individuals may or may not be related along a maternal lineage and it can be concluded that the styles of vicinal burials might have been influenced by many complex factors, such as paternal lineages, periods and geographical regions. In addition, our results showed that the adult skeletons (nos 1 and 124) that were believed to be those of shamans (or leaders) in the Doigahama Yayoi population might have been related along a maternal lineage, although the skeletons did not receive vicinal burials. This fact suggests that their crucial social roles might have been inherited along a maternal lineage in the Doigahama Yayoi population
Heritage of Japan 